GAP acceptance of crossing pedestrians at urban unprotected mid- block crosswalks in divided highways

dc.contributor.authorDiddeniya, V
dc.contributor.authorGuruge, L
dc.contributor.authorWikramasinghe, V
dc.contributor.editorPerera, HLK
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:08:35Z
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:08:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.description.abstractUnprotected mid-block crosswalk is a hazardous location for pedestrians. In order to fulfil the crossing action at mid-block crosswalks in divided highways, the pedestrian must accept two gaps. The primary objective of this research is to find out whether there exists any significant difference between these two accepted gaps. Video footage was collected at an unprotected mid-block crosswalk located in a two-lane two-way divided dual carriageway. The data was extracted using an image processing software. Hypothesis testing was performed. The paired ttest results show that there is no significant difference between the two mean accepted gap values of the two crossing actions. The secondary objective was to develop a gap estimation model for an unprotected crosswalk in a divided highway. The effective gap was selected as the dependent variable to fit the model as there is no significant difference between the two gaps. Thus, multiple linear regression model was fitted in order to estimate the gap acceptance with pedestrian characteristics and vehicle stream characteristics. Gender, age, crossing point, waiting time, and crossing speed were selected as pedestrian characteristics while vehicle type and lane number were selected as vehicle stream characteristics. R statistical software was used for the model analysis. The regression model was developed with significant variables; gender and vehicle type. The results showed that females are accepting higher gap than males when crossing the crosswalks as an example, female pedestrian accepts 12.3sec gap when male pedestrian’s acceptance gap is 9.46sec. When considering vehicle type, as an example pedestrian’s acceptance gap is higher when the heavy vehicles were oncoming. The findings of this study can be useful for traffic planning work whilst assuring the safety of both pedestrians and drivers.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiddeniya, V., Guruge, L., & Wikramasinghe, V. (2020). GAP acceptance of crossing pedestrians at urban unprotected mid- block crosswalks in divided highways [Abstract]. In H.L.K. Perera (Ed.), Proceedings of the Transportation Research Forum 2020 (p. 37). Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa. https://uom.lk/sites/default/files/civil/files/TRF%202020_0.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.conferenceTransport Research Forum 2020en_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.emailvishmacharuka@gmail.comen_US
dc.identifier.emailmalika.l@sliit.lken_US
dc.identifier.emailvasantha.w@sliit.lken_US
dc.identifier.facultyEngineeringen_US
dc.identifier.pgnos[p. 37]en_US
dc.identifier.placeKatubeddaen_US
dc.identifier.proceedingProceedings of the Transport Research Forum 2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/17975
dc.identifier.year2020en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwaen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://uom.lk/sites/default/files/civil/files/TRF%202020_0.pdfen_US
dc.subjectUnprotected mid-block crosswalksen_US
dc.subjectDivided highwaysen_US
dc.subjectCritical gapen_US
dc.subjectCrossing pedestriansen_US
dc.titleGAP acceptance of crossing pedestrians at urban unprotected mid- block crosswalks in divided highwaysen_US
dc.typeConference-Abstracten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GAP Acceptance of Crossing Pedestrians at Urban Unprotected Mid- Block.pdf
Size:
222.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections