Comparison between the terms constructability and buildability : a systematic literature review

dc.contributor.authorWimalaratne, PLI
dc.contributor.authorKulathunga, U
dc.contributor.authorGajendran, T
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T05:01:50Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T05:01:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.description.abstractBuildability deals with the optimal integration of construction expertise at various project stages to achieve the overall project goals. Incorporation of buildability improves the construction project performance in terms of its cost, quality, productivity, safety, and results early completion. Thus, having a sound understanding of buildability concept is paramount for finding solutions for transforming current practices towards successful project deliveries. The numerous past studies reviewing the concept of buildability in the past have highlighted the interchangeability of the terms “constructability” and “buildability”. However, in some studies, these two terms contradict rather than considered similar. Moreover, the application of the concept of buildability is widely discussed during the design phase while some studies recommend it to be applied in the construction phase. Thus, there is no clear consensus on the clarity of the key constructs of these terms or when to apply buildability. This paper aims to systematically review the application of the concepts “buildability” and “constructability” in the construction sector and compare the definitions to understand the key constructs and best phase of the construction project for its applicability. A structured literature review covering indexed publications from 2011-2021 was carried out to identify the existing literature. Following a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) technique, a total of 38 out of 162 research contributions have been considered for an in-depth analysis. The choice of interpretations, comments, statements, perspectives, and definitions used in 38 studies were examined. The study identified the key constructs of two terms and recommends applying buildability throughout the lifecycle of the project.en_US
dc.identifier.conferenceWorld Construction Symposium - 2021en_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Building Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2021.17en_US
dc.identifier.emailindraniw@uom.lken_US
dc.identifier.emailukulatunga@uom.lken_US
dc.identifier.emailthayaparan.gajendran@newcastle.edu.auen_US
dc.identifier.facultyArchitectureen_US
dc.identifier.pgnospp. 196-207en_US
dc.identifier.placeSri Lankaen_US
dc.identifier.proceeding9th World Construction Symposium - 2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/16631
dc.identifier.year2021en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBuildabilityen_US
dc.subjectConstructability
dc.subjectConstruction
dc.subjectSystematic literature review
dc.titleComparison between the terms constructability and buildability : a systematic literature reviewen_US
dc.typeConference-Full-texten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison between the terms constructability and.pdf
Size:
883.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections