Building project performance evaluation model

dc.contributor.authorWadugodapitiya, RRMMK
dc.contributor.authorSandanayake, YG
dc.contributor.authorThurairajah, N
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-21T06:36:15Z
dc.date.available2016-09-21T06:36:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-21
dc.description.abstractBuilding project performance evaluation is a novel research interest in performance measurement (PM) and it is the process of quantifying the efficiency and effectiveness of construction activities. The traditional view of PM highly relies on financial and accounting data, which gives only the past performance. Moreover, the construction industry has been always criticized for its under performance due to its uniqueness in nature. According to past researchers, there is lack of an appropriate PM system to improve construction performance. There is therefore a necessity for multi-dimensional approach to measure the building construction project performance. Past literature reveals that both balanced scorecard (BSC) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) tools have been used in manufacturing industry for performance evaluation. This study therefore developed a multidimensional performance measurement model for building construction project performance evaluation by integrating BSC and AHP tools. Comprehensive literature review and preliminary survey approach were used to develop a novel extended BSC model, which comprises with six perspectives namely, Client, Financial, Internal business processes, Project team, Health, safety and environmental, and Innovation, learning and growth. Extended BSC model further comprises with key building project performance indicators (KBPPIs) in each perspective. Structured questionnaire survey was then conducted to collect data and AHP tool was used to analyze and prioritize BSC perspectives and KBPPIs. Survey findings revealed that client and financial perspectives have relatively two times higher important level than other perspectives in the model while, three times important than innovation, learning and growth perspective. In conclusion, this novel multi-dimensional performance measurement model can be duly applied by construction industry practitioners to optimize building performance.en_US
dc.identifier.conference18th CIB World Building Congressen_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Building Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.emailmanjulawadugodapitiya@yahoo.comen_US
dc.identifier.emailyasangee@yahoo.comen_US
dc.identifier.emailn.thurairajah@salford.ac.uken_US
dc.identifier.facultyArchitectureen_US
dc.identifier.pgnospp. 258 - 269en_US
dc.identifier.placeSalforden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/12045
dc.identifier.year2010en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectperformance measurement (PM), extended balanced scorecard (BSC), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), key building project performance indicators (KBPPIs)en_US
dc.titleBuilding project performance evaluation modelen_US
dc.typeConference-Abstracten_US

Files