Comparison of sustainable materials for railway track support systems: a literature review

dc.contributor.authorSenaratne, S
dc.contributor.authorMirza, O
dc.contributor.authorDekruif, T
dc.contributor.editorSandanayake, YG
dc.contributor.editorRamachandra, T
dc.contributor.editorGunatilake, S
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T10:24:26Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T10:24:26Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.description.abstractTimber transoms have been extensively used in the railway industry for decades and are considered the most efficient and effective in terms of reliability and performance for railway infrastructure transom components However, many studies have raised concerns surrounding the future of sustainable use and cyclic maintenance and replacement requirement of timber transom’s in railway infrastructure Over the past decade, there has been significant research and development in alternative railway transom replacements using a variety of new materials. It is vital to develop a detailed understanding of existing and new alternative transom materials that are emerging into the railway industry and delineate whether these materials may be suitable as a sustainable alternative to traditional methods. Hence, the aim of this paper was to evaluate suitability of alternative transom materials as a substitute to existing transom materials in railway track support systems. The alternative materials considered were Precast Concrete and Composite Fibre Technology Panels against the conventional timber transforms. The paper offers a comparison between these materials through a literature review. It was concluded that the fibre composite alternative has the most beneficial alternative transom option and the railway industry could consider this material as an innovative, sustainable material for railway track support system.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSenaratne, S., Mirza, O., & Dekruif, T. (2017). Comparison of sustainable materials for railway track support systems: a literature review. In Y.G. Sandanayake, T. Ramachandra & S. Gunatilake (Eds.), What’s new and what’s next in the built environment sustainability agenda? (pp. 123-130). Ceylon Institute of Builders. https://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2017-Proceedings.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.conference6th World Construction Symposium 2017en_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Building Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.emails.senaratne@westernsydney.edu.auen_US
dc.identifier.facultyArchitectureen_US
dc.identifier.pgnospp. 123-130en_US
dc.identifier.placeColomboen_US
dc.identifier.proceedingWhat’s new and what’s next in the built environment sustainability agenda?en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/17505
dc.identifier.year2017en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCeylon Institute of Buildersen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2017-Proceedings.pdfen_US
dc.subjectFibre composite technologyen_US
dc.subjectPrecast concreteen_US
dc.subjectRailway track support systemsen_US
dc.subjectSustainability timber transformsen_US
dc.titleComparison of sustainable materials for railway track support systems: a literature reviewen_US
dc.typeConference-Full-texten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
COMPARISON OF SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS FOR RAILWAY TRACK.pdf
Size:
145.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections