Evaluating community participation effectiveness in landscape architectural design and planning: with special reference to passaiyoor and rasavinthottam parks, Jaffna

dc.contributor.authorMallikarachchi, CD
dc.contributor.authorEkanayake, M
dc.contributor.editorDayaratne, R
dc.contributor.editorWijesundara, J
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T08:22:58Z
dc.date.available2023-12-04T08:22:58Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.description.abstractThe majority of Sri Lankan context projects were planned and developed less prioritizing the community's actual needs. As a result of this top-down approach, when it comes to execution, there are certain disagreements between the government and the community. Many contemporary planning theorists acknowledge that public participation in the planning process can produce or create credibility, trust, and commitment. Even though a fairly modest number of landscape architectural projects have been carried out in Sri Lanka incorporating community participation, the effective integration of such data into public landscape design and development is yet to be explored. Therefore, this paper investigates the effectiveness of community participation in the design and planning process of Passaiyoor Park and Rasavinthottam Park in Jaffna, Sri Lanka. The methods of data collection include interviews, questionnaires, documents, and project reports. The effectiveness of public participation was evaluated by a toolkit of indicators derived from the literature. (indicators such as Administration, Information, Objectives, Stage, Targeting, Technique, Legitimacy, Common values, Fairness and equality, Equal power, and responsible leadership). The research outcomes were able to portray that the overall satisfaction level of the community participation process is 75% in Rasavinthottam Park and 77% in Passaiyoor Park, while the overall satisfaction level about the project outcome is 45% in Rasavinthottam Park and 22% in Passaiyoor Park. In fact, evidence that the execution of the community’s vision in the real ground seems to be lacking. Therefore, without putting pre-initiated projects (by the government) into action, identify the problems that are most relevant to the public and pay attention to engage the community early and throughout the process, not only for one stage, and make sure the process is transparent to all the community and the outcome of the project is their real need.en_US
dc.identifier.citation**en_US
dc.identifier.conference9th International Urban Design Conference on Cities, People and Places ICCPP- 2023en_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Architectureen_US
dc.identifier.facultyArchitectureen_US
dc.identifier.pgnospp. 59-76en_US
dc.identifier.placeColombo, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.identifier.proceedingProceedings of the International Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- ICCPP-2023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/21898
dc.identifier.year2023en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCentre for Cities & Department of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectCommunity participationen_US
dc.subjectLandscape design and planningen_US
dc.subjectCommunities’ needen_US
dc.subjectEffectiveness indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectEffectiveness of community participationen_US
dc.titleEvaluating community participation effectiveness in landscape architectural design and planning: with special reference to passaiyoor and rasavinthottam parks, Jaffnaen_US
dc.typeConference-Full-texten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EVALUATING COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION.pdf
Size:
2.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections