Finding the best level of filler master batch to be accommodated in thin gauged primary packaging products

dc.contributor.advisorGunapala, O
dc.contributor.authorFarharth, MLM
dc.date.accept2017-04
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T14:48:48Z
dc.date.available2017-11-13T14:48:48Z
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this dissertationwas“Finding the best level of filler master batch to be accommodated in thin gauged primary packaging products”, as currently there is only limited information available in the printed media especially for Thermoforming made thin gauged food contact plastic products. Here only the thermoformed thin gauged primary packaging products made out of Polystyrene and Polypropylene materials were studied. To find out best filler level in plastic compounds 2 series of formulations such as Series N1 for Polystyrene based materials and Series N2 for Polypropylene based materials were prepared, where virgin filler load level varied from 0% to 25% were prepared and experimented. And these formulations were based on incremental addition of heavy filler such as Calcium Carbonate in virgin form as Filler Master Batch. Each and every Raw Material batches were tested for MFI (Melt flow Index) against the specification. Thin gauged sheets were extruded according to the decided formulation. Products were turnout via thermoforming process to test for consumer acceptance. Further in order to find out the best level of filler master batch to be accommodated to these products, thermoformed primary packaging was examined for Appearance Test, Specific Gravity test, Drop Test or Impact test, Oil Test and Actual Filler Master Batch test .Those testswere carried out to find out whether physical and aesthetic properties were compromised or not. It was observed during the trials that 25% Virgin FMB based formulated sheets were not suitable for thermoforming process as it tended to crack and torn like a paper. It was concluded through Actual FMB level test, that the accumulated Calcium Carbonate Filler level in the regrind introduced in these formulation had an impact on overall level of fillers in the extruded sheets had caused these cracks and defects. Based on the test results it was concluded that 26% of Filler in Styrene based materials and 40% of Fillers in polypropylene based materials were the optimum level of Filler Master Batch for these thin gauged primary packaging products.en_US
dc.identifier.accnoTH3431en_US
dc.identifier.degreeMaster of Science in Chemical and Process Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.facultyEngineeringen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/12876
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING
dc.subjectPOLYMER TECHNOLOGY
dc.subjectTHIN GAUGED FOOD CONTACT PLASTIC PRODUCTS
dc.titleFinding the best level of filler master batch to be accommodated in thin gauged primary packaging productsen_US
dc.typeThesis-Full-texten_US

Files