Browsing by Author "Weerakkody, NC"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    item: Thesis-Abstract
    Evaluation of public participation and methodologies adopted in environmental impact assessment process in Sri Lanka
    Weerakkody, NC; Wijesekera, NTS
    "Environment" and "Development" are interdependent and mutually reinforcing each other. The ultimate goal and purpose of both environment and development policies is betterment, improvement and the enhancement of the quality of life. Exploitation of natural and human resources should be planned carefully to ensure a sustainable development. In order to ensure a sustainable development, Western Countries have introduced a planning tool, i.e. Environmental Impact Assessment process to assess the impacts of any development project to its environment. Mitigatory measures also suggested in the EIA report to minimize the negative impacts. Public involvement is one of the significant and important events in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process. This process expects to ensure that the environmental concerns are incorporated into the project. In order to fulfill this requirement, it is necessary to seek public participation throughout the project development process. The ETA process has built-in openings for public participation. Therefore, it needs to investigate whether such participation has been effective or needs improvement to ensure that the development works are not slowed down. The main objective of the study is to identity the present level of public participation in IEE/EIA projects and the methodologies used for development projects. To achieve this objective, thirteen IEEs and fifteen EIAs were selected. The respective IEE/EIA reports and administrative files were analyzed. After analyzing the IEE/EIA reports and files, public participation was looked at in different aspects, i.e. the sectors participated, the stages in the EIA process, the issues raised by the public in their comments and the methodologies adopted in the EIA process. These aspects were studies under different project types, i.e. Mainly IEE/EIA, Effluent generating/Effluent non-generating and localized/spatially distributed projects. Accordingly, general public participation on TEE project is very low compared that with the EIA projects. Study reveals general public participation on IEE projects is 2% and in EIA projects 98%. The overall public response on development projects are fairly low. Data reveals the maximum overall participation on development projects is only 42%. Also, the public is highly concern on social impacts specially in EIA projects, Effluent non-generating projects and spatially distributed projects.
  • Thumbnail Image
    item: Article-Abstract
    Public participation in environmental assessment of development projects : The Sri Lankan situation
    Wijesekera, NTS; Weerakkody, NC
    Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) are meant to identify and evaluate the impacts of projects on the environment and interventions in it. The Environmental Assessment Process is to ensure that environmental concerns are incorporated in development projects for the well being of the environment and this requires public participation throughout the project development process. In literature there are many efforts that had been exerted to identify the rights and necessities with respect to public participation. Also comments have been made by* many indicating poor public participation in the EIA process and stating the need to improve the same. Presently there is a need to quantify the present level of public participation in projects in order to enable the understanding of the realities of public participation and fo ensure that the best development option is implemented at the earliest possible time. This study was done to look at a significant number of EIA and IEE projects of various Sri Lankan -Authorities that underwent the approval procedures. Twenty eight EIA and IEE project reports were studied along with the administrative coirespondence files maintained at the environmental authorities. The participation in terms of the sectors, stages, issues, and comments made by the public were looked at and quantifications were done. From the numbers participated it was revealed that the overall public involvement in development projects is very low and the maximum overall participation in these projects is around 42%. The public involvement in scoping was found to be Zero in the studied projects. In EIA projects the public were more concerned about the social impacts. There is a need to increase public participation irrespective of the nature of it's participation. Then the quality of participation in national projects should be emphasized to ensure the sustainability concerns of all development projects.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    item: Conference-Abstract